From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, akpm@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, reuben-lkml@reub.net,
zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] USB_LIBUSUAL shouldn't be user-visible
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 01:31:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051111013142.269b1db5.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051111020938.GJ5376@stusta.de>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:09:38 +0100, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> What about my second suggestion to always use libusual in the two
> drivers instead of having two code paths in each of them?
I don't see how you would be able to mandate libusual, since it adds
(a small amount of) bloat. I foresee some distributions building without
it for years. Debian is likely to take such course.
We certainly can apply such a patch and tell all complainers to suck
it up, but I am not sure if that would be embraced by distro developers.
I do not want to risk anything that may derail acceptance into
Linus' tree.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-11 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 2:24 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 3:25 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07 6:12 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 6:34 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Herbert Xu
2005-11-07 3:30 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07 12:18 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Roman Zippel
2005-11-07 17:02 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-07 17:23 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Roman Zippel
2005-11-07 12:41 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-11-07 4:04 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Brice Goglin
2005-11-07 4:10 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 6:07 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 8:24 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Benoit Boissinot
2005-11-07 9:54 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 10:09 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 10:26 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Neil Brown
2005-11-07 10:37 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 10:44 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 18:52 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 19:27 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alan Stern
2005-11-07 19:27 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alan Stern
2005-11-07 21:43 ` 2.6.14-mm1 J.A. Magallon
2005-11-08 0:07 ` 2.6.14-mm1 J.A. Magallon
2005-11-08 14:21 ` 2.6.14-mm1 James Bottomley
2005-11-09 0:30 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-07 12:00 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Jiri Slaby
2005-11-07 15:04 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dustin Kirkland
2005-11-07 15:11 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Jiri Slaby
2005-11-07 16:15 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-11-07 19:52 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 20:07 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Greg KH
2005-11-07 20:30 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-07 20:21 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-11-07 20:40 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Dmitry Torokhov
2005-11-07 20:46 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-11 9:32 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
[not found] ` <437472DA.4090001@linuxfromscratch.org>
2005-11-11 11:50 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-11-07 17:37 ` 2.6.14-mm1: drivers/pci/hotplug/: namespace clashes Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 18:41 ` Rajesh Shah
2005-11-07 20:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 21:37 ` Rajesh Shah
2005-11-07 21:10 ` 2.6.14-mm1: Why is USB_LIBUSUAL user-visible? Adrian Bunk
2005-11-07 21:52 ` Greg KH
2005-11-07 22:26 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Alan Stern
2005-11-07 22:28 ` Greg KH
2005-11-08 0:47 ` [-mm patch] USB_LIBUSUAL shouldn't be user-visible Adrian Bunk
2005-11-09 22:28 ` Greg KH
2005-11-10 6:41 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-10 10:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 23:46 ` Greg KH
2005-11-11 2:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-11 6:13 ` Greg KH
2005-11-11 9:31 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2005-11-10 12:11 ` Reuben Farrelly
2005-11-11 9:14 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-07 23:34 ` 2.6.14-mm1: Why is USB_LIBUSUAL user-visible? Pete Zaitcev
2005-11-07 22:28 ` 2.6.14-mm1 - cpufreq build problem Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-11-08 4:36 ` [-mm patch] __deprecated_for_modules the lookup_hash() prototype Adrian Bunk
2005-11-10 13:07 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Serge Hallyn
[not found] ` <OFE00FE25C.725B5669-ON872570B5.0066EFF0-862570B5.00679646@us.ibm.com>
2005-11-11 17:59 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Serge Hallyn
2005-11-14 17:05 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Greg KH
2005-11-12 0:31 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-12 0:51 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-12 1:30 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
2005-11-12 1:47 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-11-12 18:00 ` 2.6.14-mm1 Michal Piotrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051111013142.269b1db5.zaitcev@redhat.com \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=reuben-lkml@reub.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.