From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.198] helo=moskovskaya.fh-wedel.de) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.54 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1EaVqD-00089t-Oh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2005 05:09:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:08:59 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: "Pierre.Ricadat@UTBM.fr" Message-ID: <20051111100859.GA23660@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <1130311964.435f311cf30e9@webmail2.utbm.fr> <20051028142739.GB1269@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1130753526.4365edf6b2807@webmail1.utbm.fr> <20051031143345.GB27238@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1130771777.4366354129c88@webmail1.utbm.fr> <20051031152430.GC27238@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <1131702259.437467f3dd940@webmail2.utbm.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1131702259.437467f3dd940@webmail2.utbm.fr> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] separate routine to check jffs2_flash_read List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 11 November 2005 10:44:19 +0100, Pierre.Ricadat@UTBM.fr wrote: > Quoting Jörn Engel : > > > Hmmyess, makes sense. I'd vote for inclusion "right after the merge". > > > > Not sure what that actually means. If it takes too long, I might just > > shrug and dump new stuff into cvs. We've had a calm-down period for a > > while now and the merge could even happen with code from some date > > like today. > > Could it be added to cvs now? In principle, yes. I get half a page of rejects, though. Can you respin the patch against current cvs, preferrably so that it applies with patch -p1? Jörn -- Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent. -- Sun Tzu