From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 02:47:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [KJ] Question Re: fs/udf/super.c Message-Id: <20051113024747.GL1658@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============63669887142549264==" List-Id: References: <200511122110.52472.ace@staticwave.ca> In-Reply-To: <200511122110.52472.ace@staticwave.ca> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============63669887142549264== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:10:52PM -0500, Gabriel A. Devenyi wrote: > At line 795 we see this > > --clip-- > return 1; > > for (newfileset.partitionReferenceNum=UDF_SB_NUMPARTS(sb)-1; > (newfileset.partitionReferenceNum != 0xFFFF && > fileset->logicalBlockNum == 0xFFFFFFFF && > fileset->partitionReferenceNum == 0xFFFF); > newfileset.partitionReferenceNum--) > { > --40 more lines-- > > Anyone see a reason why this code that never runs shouldn't be removed? Did you try asking the UDF list why this is here? --===============63669887142549264== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============63669887142549264==--