From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/10] convert st to use scsi_execute_async Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:15:42 +0100 Message-ID: <20051114151541.GQ3699@suse.de> References: <1131444404.23111.66.camel@max> <43763E94.40406@cs.wisc.edu> <43764861.6030408@cs.wisc.edu> <437772EA.7080100@redhat.com> <437842DA.80800@torque.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:25138 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751147AbVKNPOs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:14:48 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437842DA.80800@torque.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Douglas Gilbert Cc: Doug Ledford , Kai Makisara , Mike Christie , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 14 2005, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > It might indeed be a bad idea, but there is the odd SCSI > command that is defined that way. I wonder if any cd/dvd > drive implements the GET EVENT STATUS NOTIFICATION command > in asynchronous notification mode (see MMC-4)? I don't think so, at least I've never heard of it actually being implemented. The async notification requires TCQ support in the cd/dvd device, I've never seen that either. -- Jens Axboe