From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EbfW4-0004o8-Cx for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:41:04 -0800 Received: from lakshmi.addtoit.com ([198.99.130.6] helo=lakshmi.solana.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EbfW2-0005ok-Tk for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 06:41:04 -0800 From: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] Ok, I build x86-64 -skas0, and it still segfaults. Message-ID: <20051114153352.GA4303@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200511121936.41697.rob@landley.net> <20051113193256.GA25736@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200511132020.01596.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <200511131732.11279.rob@landley.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511131732.11279.rob@landley.net> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:33:52 -0500 To: Rob Landley Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Blaisorblade On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:32:10PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On Sunday 13 November 2005 13:20, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 20:32, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:41PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > Stub registers - > > > > 0 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 1 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 2 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 3 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 4 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 5 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 6 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 7 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 8 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 9 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 10 - 0 > > > > 11 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 12 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 13 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 14 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 15 - ffffffffffffffff > > > > 16 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 17 - 33 > > > > 18 - 292 > > > > 19 - 9090909090909090 > > > > 20 - 2b > > > > > > I remain baffled by this. There is nothing valid there. At the very > > > least RSP and RIP should be reasonable, and they're not. > > I understand this a bit better. We have some signal frame corruption going on. When there's a signal return, somehow RSP is pointing at all these no-ops. Jeff ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel