From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernd Zeimetz Subject: Re: BUG: iptables -j does not work for chains with a length >=28 (was moe infos...) Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:15:31 +0100 Message-ID: <200511151715.32138.bernd@zeimetz.de> References: <200511150139.51688.bernd@zeimetz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: 327007@bugs.debian.org Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org In-Reply-To: <200511150139.51688.bernd@zeimetz.de> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Hi, > As you can see the bug does not happen for chains > - with a length <=28 > - with a name containing only numbers > - with a name beginning with numbers and having less than ~11 letters at > the end. this is - of course - not true. I didn't realize that > iptables -N 123456789012345678yzabcdefgh > and this works: > iptables -A FORWARD -j 123456789012345678yzabcdefghij this happened pretty often while testing. > set_revision(target->t->u.user.name, target->revision); // iptables.c:2397 What does set_revision really do? Is it still needed? Thanks, Bernd