From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ecm9e-0005ky-Q6 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:58:30 -0800 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140] helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1Ecm9c-0002hy-En for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:58:31 -0800 From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Getting the x86-64 rollup patch to work on my x86 laptop. References: <200511161100.31053.rob@landley.net> <200511170716.46519.rob@landley.net> <20051117163723.GA5878@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20051117163723.GA5878@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511170958.17364.rob@landley.net> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:58:17 -0600 To: Jeff Dike Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thursday 17 November 2005 10:37, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > is what I had to apply to 2.6.15-rc1 to get that to work). I think that > > included tls, but since the target system doesn't use it I don't know. > > OK, well your recipe results in this > > $ grep MODE obj1/.config > # CONFIG_MODE_TT is not set > # CONFIG_MODE_SKAS is not set > > which is not a healthy config. It fails to build here, but the errors are > different. That means you didn't get the uml-miniconf I attached to my message copied into allno.config in the source directory. (Did I typo my script?) 2.6.15-rc1 developed a new feature that lets you take a config snippet setting just the features you want and generate a working .config from that. I wrote some bad documentation for it earlier this morning: http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Nov/5804.html > This case does need better error checking though. > > Can you check a config that actually has a chance of running? I'm fairly certain I did. That's why my errors are different. :) > Jeff Rob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel