From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:28:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from extgw-uk.mips.com ([62.254.210.129]:795 "EHLO bacchus.net.dhis.org") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S8133742AbVKRR2K (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:28:10 +0000 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bacchus.net.dhis.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAIHTmAF018549; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:29:48 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id jAIHTmlv018548; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:29:48 GMT Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:29:48 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Jim Gifford Cc: Kumba , Linux MIPS List , Peter Horton Subject: Re: MIPS - 64bit woes Message-ID: <20051118172948.GE2707@linux-mips.org> References: <436D0061.5070100@jg555.com> <4371B87A.9040101@jg555.com> <4371FB46.1000805@gentoo.org> <4372304A.9080608@jg555.com> <4379FBF4.1040505@jg555.com> <437D0AE2.9040706@jg555.com> <437D2C97.8070804@jg555.com> <20051118171706.GD2707@linux-mips.org> <437E0E68.7010008@jg555.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437E0E68.7010008@jg555.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 9524 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:24:56AM -0800, Jim Gifford wrote: > I'll give it a shot and send back results and a updated patch. > > One more question, what is the future off the iomap.c file, I didn't > include it in my patch. Could it be simply be added to arch/mips/cobalt? > I can only speak for the RaQ2, but is it required for any of the other > MIPS based machines? No. It's broken for machines with multiple PCI busses and I've explicitly rejected the patch which is in kernel.org before. Ralf