From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750725AbVKSRde (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:33:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750726AbVKSRdd (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:33:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:48016 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725AbVKSRdd (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:33:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:33:10 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Manfred Spraul Cc: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colpatch@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] slab: extract slab order calculation to separate function Message-Id: <20051119093310.281ffbc2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <437F199C.9040505@colorfullife.com> References: <437F199C.9040505@colorfullife.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manfred Spraul wrote: > > >+ } else > >+ left_over = calculate_slab_order(cachep, size, align, flags); > > > > > > I usually add braces in this case: If braces are necessary for either > the if or the else-clause, then I add braces to both parts. > > Could be applied as is, or I could write a patch with both changes. > Andrew - what do you prefer? I normally add the braces in both legs of the `if' if one leg needs them. But it looks crappy either way, so whatever.