From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Feustel Subject: Re: USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:24:11 -0500 Message-ID: <200511211024.11770.dfeustel@verizon.net> References: <1132579104.31295.110.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200511210925.21295.dfeustel@verizon.net> <20051121143612.GC25045@snarc.org> Reply-To: dfeustel@mindspring.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20051121143612.GC25045@snarc.org> Content-disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Vincent Hanquez Cc: harry , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Monday 21 November 2005 09:36, Vincent Hanquez wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:25:20AM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: > > Could you post an example (from the patches, if possible) of > > an "anonymous inline function"? > > that what you call code block that are nested into another one > without having any do, while, if, for ... > > they are almost like an inlined function in term of code and as they > don't got a label, that make them anonymous. > > example: > > int fct(void) > { > int i; > > ... > { > int j; > ... > } > ... > } > > the patches contains lots of them everywhere. Thanks for posting the example with explanation. What about this example bothers you and makes you think this use of brackets should not be permitted (if in fact this is your position)? -- Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!! NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2!