From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sander Subject: Re: Collect data? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:31:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20051123153140.GA1736@favonius> References: <200511171447.41362.mail@earthworm.de> <200511231253.37328.mail@earthworm.de> <20051123121751.GC26252@favonius> <200511231321.18455.mail@earthworm.de> <20051123122809.GA31528@favonius> <43846A0C.6010808@namesys.com> <20051123151016.GA7768@favonius> <4384888E.2040407@namesys.com> Reply-To: sander@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4384888E.2040407@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Cc: sander@humilis.net, "Hesse, Christian" , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, "E.Gryaznova" Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): > Sander wrote: > > Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): > >>Please unapply the attached patch and check whether it makes any effect. > > > > Is there any risk involved in testing this patch? > > It should not. The only problem it will cause is not updating atime on accessing > files. > > > And is this a real patch which fixes a real problem, or is it a test? > > No. This is not a fix. This is a patch which I suspect is responsible for sync > performance drop. It fixes old reiser4 bug known as "not updating atime". > I asked you to reverse this patch to check whether this patch caused recent sync > performance degradation. Ah! Now, if I remount my Reiser4 filesystem noatime,nodiratime, the problem is gone. Does that help? Do you still want me to test a kernel with your patch? -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net