All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/xdr.c: remove xdr_decode_string()
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:25:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051123162528.GL3963@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <044B81DE141D7443BCE91E8F44B3C1E2013327DF@exsvl02.hq.netapp.com>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:31:14AM -0800, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > 
> > > actually, can we hold off on this change?  the RPC 
> > transport switch will
> > > eventually need most of those EXPORT_SYMBOLs.
> > 
> > Am I right to assume this will happen in the foreseeable future?
> 
> the first portion of the transport switch is in 2.6.15-rcX.  at this
> point i'm expecting the EXPORT_SYMBOL changes to go in 2.6.17 or later.

OK.

> so i don't remember why you are removing xdr_decode_string.  are we sure
> that no-one will need this functionality in the future?  it is harmless
> to remove today, but i wonder if someone is just going to add it back
> sometime.

It's unused and you said:
  the only harmless change i see below is removing xdr_decode_string().

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-23 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-23 12:31 [2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/xdr.c: remove xdr_decode_string() Lever, Charles
2005-11-23 12:31 ` Lever, Charles
2005-11-23 12:31 ` Lever, Charles
2005-11-23 16:25 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2005-11-23 23:07   ` Neil Brown
2005-11-23 23:07     ` Neil Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-14 21:10 Adrian Bunk
2005-12-14 21:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-24  6:56 Lever, Charles
2005-10-06 14:13 [NFS] [RFC: 2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/: possible cleanups Lever, Charles
2005-11-23  1:24 ` [2.6 patch] net/sunrpc/xdr.c: remove xdr_decode_string() Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23  1:24   ` Adrian Bunk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051123162528.GL3963@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.