From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 16:55:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cda58cb80511300845j18c81ce6p@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 05:45:33PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> 2005/11/30, Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 05:21:35PM +0100, Franck wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > What about this patch which removes ARM dependency for dm9000 ethernet
> > > controller driver ?
> > >
> > Maybe that should be (ARM || MIPS) && NET_ETHERNET ?
> >
>
> Well, if this dependency means "it has only be tested on ARM and
> MIPS", then you're probably right. But if it means "this controller
> must be run with an ARM or MIPS cpu" then I don't see why setting such
> restriction. What do you think ?
If other CPUs use this then fine, but I find that having config options
needlessly available to all architectures is annoying - especially when
they are never used.
Eg, would you ever expect to see a DM9000 ethernet device on an x86
machine? Probably not - there's far better PCI solutions now.
So until someone says "I want to use this on such and such arch" I
think it's better to keep it dependent on those we know are likely
to support it.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-30 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-30 16:21 [NET] Remove ARM dependency for dm9000 driver Franck
2005-11-30 16:23 ` Russell King
2005-11-30 16:45 ` Franck
2005-11-30 16:55 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-11-30 17:07 ` Franck
2005-11-30 18:14 ` David Woodhouse
2005-11-30 19:02 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 8:36 ` David Woodhouse
2005-12-01 9:41 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 9:51 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-01 10:52 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 11:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-12-01 11:37 ` Russell King
2005-12-01 15:20 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-12-01 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-11-30 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-01 7:56 ` Franck
2005-12-01 23:17 ` Matan Ziv-Av
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051130165546.GD1053@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.