All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: DervishD <lartc@dervishd.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Which option is better
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:16:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051202201637.GA666@DervishD> (raw)

    Hi all :)

    Currently I'm shaping the traffic that goes to my ADSL router,
using HTB.

.    Root (HTB) 1:
.    |
.    |------------------------|
.    LAN (1:1)                ADSL router (1:2)
.    90Mbit/90MBit            200000bit/200000bit
.                             |
.                             (Here go some children classes)

    I find the above a bit overkill, since LAN and ADSL classes won't
NEVER borrow nor lend bandwidth to one another. Moreover, every time
I set up my traffic control I get the same warning:

    HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

    Of course it is big!, it's my LAN class, limited to 90Mbit/s...

    Is there any better alternative to the above, given the great
difference in rates and the fact that I won't NEVER share bandwidth
between 1:1 and 1:2?

    Thanks a lot in advance :)

    Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

-- 
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to...
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-02 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-02 20:16 DervishD [this message]
2005-12-02 20:58 ` [LARTC] Which option is better Andreas Klauer
2005-12-02 21:13 ` DervishD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051202201637.GA666@DervishD \
    --to=lartc@dervishd.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.