From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org,
shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- early cpu_to_node
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051202225156.GC3727@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051202114349.GL997@wotan.suse.de>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:43:49PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > + /*
> > + * Setup cpu_to_node using the SRAT lapcis & ACPI MADT table
> > + * info.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++)
> > + cpu_to_node[i] = apicid_to_node[x86_cpu_to_apicid[i]];
> > +#endif
>
> This should be in a separate function in srat.c.
OK,
>
> And are you sure it will work with k8topology.c. Doesn't look like
> that to me.
I don't have a K8 box yet :(, so I cannot confirm either ways.
But I thought newer opterons need to use ACPI_NUMA instead...
<Kconfig quote>
config K8_NUMA
bool "Old style AMD Opteron NUMA detection"
depends on NUMA
default y
help
Enable K8 NUMA node topology detection. You should say Y here if
you have a multi processor AMD K8 system. This uses an old
method to read the NUMA configurtion directly from the builtin
Northbridge of Opteron. It is recommended to use X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
instead, which also takes priority if both are compiled in.
</quote>
Even if K8 detection is used, cpu_pda will have memory allocated from node0
which is not different from the current state. So this patch helps Opterons
and EM64t boxes which use ACPI_NUMA, right? Also the newer opteron boxes
and em64t NUMA boxes can now get node local memory for static per-cpu areas.
Thanks,
Kiran
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-02 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-02 8:10 [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- early cpu_to_node Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:16 ` [patch 2/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- Use macros to access cpu_pda Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:23 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- allocate node local memory for pda Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-12-02 18:24 ` [discuss] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 9:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-02 10:36 ` [RFC] NUMA aware kthread_create() ? Eric Dumazet
2005-12-02 12:32 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 11:47 ` [patch 3/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- allocate node local memory for pda Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 20:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 22:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 11:43 ` [patch 1/3] x86_64: Node local PDA -- early cpu_to_node Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 22:51 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2005-12-02 23:02 ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen
2005-12-02 23:43 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2005-12-02 23:48 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051202225156.GC3727@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.