From: Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@mandriva.com>
To: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t.
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:13:32 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051207145113.4cbdc264.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2049 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:51:13PM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:41:18 -0800
> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:
>
> | On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 09:56:10AM -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote:
> | > Greg,
> | >
> | > Don't get scared. :-)
> |
> | I'm not scared, just not liking this patch series at all.
> |
> | In the end, it's just moving from one locking scheme to another. No big
> | deal.
>
> I understand.
>
> | The problem is, none of this should be needed at all. We need to move
> | the usb-serial drivers over to use the serial core code. If that
> | happens, then none of this locking is needed.
> |
> | That's the right thing to do, so I'm not going to take this patch series
> | right now because of that. If you all want to work on moving to use the
> | serial core, I would love to see that happen.
>
> If it's the right thing to do, I'll love to work on that. :)
>
> There is only one problem though, I've never touched in the serial core.
> It means I'll need some time to do it, and maybe the first tries can be
> wrong.
>
> Any tips you have in mind are very welcome.
I have a small question: in my view, this patch series is a small
step towards implementing the usb-serial drivers The Right Way, as it
removes a a bit of duplicated code. If we start to do The Big Change to
serial_core , probably we would make further refactorings on these parts,
going towards The Right Way to implement the drivers.
My question would be: where would the small refactorings belong, while
the big change to serial_core is work in progress? I would like them
to go to some tree for testing, while the work is being done, instead
of pushing lots of changes later, but I don't know if there is someone
who we could send them.
>
> Eduardo, let's do it? :)
I would love it, but I will be on vacations in two weeks. So, probably
on January.
My wife is lucky that I won't have a notebook available during our
vacations. 8)
--
Eduardo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 11:56 [PATCH 00/10] usb-serial: Switches from spin lock to atomic_t Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 19:40 ` Greg KH
2005-12-06 20:13 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-06 22:48 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:24 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:30 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 12:41 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 12:54 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 15:07 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 15:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:37 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 15:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 16:02 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-07 16:00 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 16:23 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:01 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-07 16:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-07 15:32 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-12-07 16:08 ` Alan Stern
2005-12-06 20:14 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 21:02 ` Pete Zaitcev
2005-12-06 21:18 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-06 22:36 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 12:25 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 13:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2005-12-07 13:17 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 16:41 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 16:51 ` Luiz Fernando Capitulino
2005-12-07 17:13 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost [this message]
2005-12-07 17:56 ` Greg KH
2005-12-07 19:10 ` Eduardo Pereira Habkost
2005-12-07 16:55 ` Otavio Salvador
2005-12-07 16:59 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051207171332.GI20451@duckman.conectiva \
--to=ehabkost@mandriva.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.