From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20051209120731.GI26185@suse.de> References: <1134062330.1732.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43989B00.5040503@pobox.com> <20051208133144.0f39cb37.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <1134121522.27633.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051209103937.GE26185@suse.de> <1134125145.27633.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43996A26.8060700@pobox.com> <1134128127.27633.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051209114641.GH26185@suse.de> <1134129692.27633.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1134129692.27633.58.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Erik Slagter Cc: Jeff Garzik , Randy Dunlap , hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org, linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-scsi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 12:46 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > > > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > > > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". > > > > The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude', > > which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi > > directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct > > replies. > > This is the post I object to: > [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113404894931377&w=2] I would imagine, and that is what I'm explaining to you. Can we please just let this die? Thanks. -- Jens Axboe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932279AbVLIMGQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:06:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932257AbVLIMGQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:06:16 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:28982 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932161AbVLIMGO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 07:06:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:07:31 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Erik Slagter Cc: Jeff Garzik , Randy Dunlap , hch@infradead.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap Message-ID: <20051209120731.GI26185@suse.de> References: <1134062330.1732.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43989B00.5040503@pobox.com> <20051208133144.0f39cb37.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <1134121522.27633.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051209103937.GE26185@suse.de> <1134125145.27633.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43996A26.8060700@pobox.com> <1134128127.27633.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051209114641.GH26185@suse.de> <1134129692.27633.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1134129692.27633.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 12:46 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > > > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > > > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". > > > > The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude', > > which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi > > directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct > > replies. > > This is the post I object to: > [http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=113404894931377&w=2] I would imagine, and that is what I'm explaining to you. Can we please just let this die? Thanks. -- Jens Axboe