From: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: [DOC PATCH] block/stat.txt
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:03:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051211010339.GA26568@hexapodia.org> (raw)
I couldn't find any docs explaining the contents of
/sys/block/<dev>/stat, so I wrote up the following. I'm not completely
sure it's accurate - Jens, could you give a yea or nay on this?
In particular, the counts of read/write IOs and read/write sectors are
incremented in different places - it looks like they both increment as
the request is being finished, but I'm not completely sure of that.
-andy
---
# HG changeset patch
# User adi@bobble.hexapodia.org
# Node ID 28202adc17846b087209ce937fa5cd0f2f4ffbbb
# Parent 03055821672a46deb8291db0cf719e39c2f0d48e
Documentation/block/stat.txt: document contents of /sys/block/<dev>/stat
diff -r 03055821672a -r 28202adc1784 Documentation/block/stat.txt
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Documentation/block/stat.txt Sat Dec 10 15:19:56 2005 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Block layer statistics in /sys/block/<dev>/stat
+===============================================
+
+This file documents the contents of the /sys/block/<dev>/stat file.
+
+The stat file provides several statistics about the state of block
+device <dev>.
+
+Q. Why are there multiple statistics in a single file? Doesn't sysfs
+ normally contain a single value per file?
+A. By having a single file, the kernel can guarantee that the statistics
+ represent a consistent snapshot of the state of the device. If the
+ statistics were exported as multiple files containing one statistic
+ each, it would be impossible to guarantee that a set of readings
+ represent a single point in time.
+
+The stat file consists of a single line of text containing 11 decimal
+values separated by whitespace. The fields are summarized in the
+following table, and described in more detail below.
+
+Name units description
+---- ----- -----------
+read I/Os requests number of read I/Os processed
+read merges requests number of read I/Os merged with in-queue I/O
+read sectors blocks number of sectors read
+read ticks milliseconds total wait time for read requests
+write I/Os requests number of write I/Os processed
+write merges requests number of write I/Os merged with in-queue I/O
+write sectors blocks number of sectors written
+write ticks milliseconds total wait time for write requests
+in_flight requests number of I/Os currently in flight
+io_ticks milliseconds total time this block device has been active
+time_in_queue milliseconds total wait time for all requests
+
+read I/Os, write I/Os
+=====================
+
+These values increment when an I/O request completes.
+
+read merges, write merges
+=========================
+
+These values increment when an I/O request is merged with an
+already-queued I/O request.
+
+read sectors, write sectors
+===========================
+
+These values count the number of blocks read from or written to this
+block device. The "blocks" in question are the standard UNIX 512-byte
+blocks, not any device-specific block size. The counters are
+incremented when the I/O completes.
+
+read ticks, write ticks
+=======================
+
+These values count the number of milliseconds that I/O requests have
+waited on this block device. If there are multiple I/O requests waiting,
+these values will increase at a rate greater than 1000/second; for
+example, if 60 read requests wait for an average of 30 ms, the read_ticks
+field will increase by 60*30 = 1800.
+
+in_flight
+=========
+
+This value counts the number of currently-queued I/O requests.
+
+io_ticks
+========
+
+This value counts the number of milliseconds during which the device has
+had I/O requests queued.
+
+time_in_queue
+=============
+
+This value counts the number of milliseconds that I/O requests have waited
+on this block device. If there are multiple I/O requests waiting, this
+value will increase as the product of the number of milliseconds times the
+number of requests waiting (see "read ticks" above for an example).
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-11 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-11 1:03 Andy Isaacson [this message]
2005-12-12 12:45 ` [DOC PATCH] block/stat.txt Jens Axboe
2005-12-13 8:41 ` Andy Isaacson
2005-12-13 18:38 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051211010339.GA26568@hexapodia.org \
--to=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.