From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (zombie.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.131])
	by tycho.ncsc.mil (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jBDFUwMA027075
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:30:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from free.hands.com (jazzdrum.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.7])
	by jazzdrum.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jBDFMQN7015626
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:22:26 GMT
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:21:57 +0000
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Pax Dickinson <pax@guardiandigital.com>
Cc: SELinux List <SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: SELinux patent issues?
Message-ID: <20051213152157.GG14978@lkcl.net>
References: <439ED72C.4040000@guardiandigital.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <439ED72C.4040000@guardiandigital.com>
Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov

On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 09:14:04AM -0500, Pax Dickinson wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I saw this comment about SELinux patent issues on Slashdot and was 
> hoping someone could enlighten me as to whether there's anything to this?
 
 most of the references i can find are dating back 3 years.

 reminder of nsa's response (but no link to that response)

 http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0502.3/0150.html

 some discussion... numerous...

 http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/list-archive/0208/date.cfm

 again a reference to SCC's "statement of assurance":

 http://lwn.net/Articles/103230/

 http://lwn.net/Articles/2376/


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.