From: Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org
Cc: ananth@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, prasanna@in.ibm.com,
systemtap@sources.redhat.com, oleg@tv-sign.ru
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] Kprobes - Changed from using spinlock to mutext
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:50:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051214155059.A5350@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051213203901.264302465@csdlinux-2.jf.intel.com>; from anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:35:50PM -0800
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:35:50PM -0800, Anil S Keshavamurthy wrote:
> [PATCH] Kprobes - Changed from using spinlock to mutext
>
> Since Kprobes runtime exception handlers is now
> lock free as this code path is now using RCU to walk
> through the list, there is no need for the
> register/unregister{_kprobe} to use
> spin_{lock/unlock}_isr{save/restore}. The serialization
> during registration/unregistration is now possible using
> just a mutex.
>
> In the above process, this patch also fixes a minor memory
> leak for x86_64 and powerpc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
Andrew,
Based on some feedback from Oleg Nesterov, I have
made few changes to previously posted patch.
The below fix should cleanly apply to the patch named
kprobes-changed-form-using-spinlock-to-mutex.patch
in you mm2 tree.
Please consider this for your next mm.
Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 3 ---
arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
kernel/kprobes.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@
#include <asm/kdebug.h>
#include <asm/sstep.h>
-static DECLARE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
@@ -54,9 +53,7 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct
/* insn must be on a special executable page on ppc64 */
if (!ret) {
- down(&kprobe_mutex);
p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
- up(&kprobe_mutex);
if (!p->ainsn.insn)
ret = -ENOMEM;
}
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/arch/x86_64/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
#include <asm/kdebug.h>
void jprobe_return_end(void);
-void __kprobes arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
+static void __kprobes arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static inline s32 *is_riprel(u8 *insn)
return NULL;
}
-void __kprobes arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
+static void __kprobes arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
s32 *ripdisp;
memcpy(p->ainsn.insn, p->addr, MAX_INSN_SIZE);
Index: linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ linux-2.6.15-rc5-git3/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int __kprobes register_aggr_kprob
copy_kprobe(old_p, p);
ret = add_new_kprobe(old_p, p);
} else {
- ap = kcalloc(1, sizeof(struct kprobe), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ ap = kcalloc(1, sizeof(struct kprobe), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ap)
return -ENOMEM;
add_aggr_kprobe(ap, old_p);
@@ -491,7 +491,8 @@ out:
void __kprobes unregister_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
struct module *mod;
- struct kprobe *old_p, *cleanup_p;
+ struct kprobe *old_p, *list_p;
+ int cleanup_p;
down(&kprobe_mutex);
old_p = get_kprobe(p->addr);
@@ -499,22 +500,25 @@ void __kprobes unregister_kprobe(struct
up(&kprobe_mutex);
return;
}
-
- if ((old_p->pre_handler == aggr_pre_handler) &&
+ if (p != old_p) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(list_p, &old_p->list, list)
+ if (list_p == p)
+ /* kprobe p is a valid probe */
+ goto valid_p;
+ up(&kprobe_mutex);
+ return;
+ }
+valid_p:
+ if ((old_p == p) || ((old_p->pre_handler == aggr_pre_handler) &&
(p->list.next == &old_p->list) &&
- (p->list.prev == &old_p->list)) {
- /* Only one element in the aggregate list */
+ (p->list.prev == &old_p->list))) {
+ /* Only probe on the hash list */
arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
hlist_del_rcu(&old_p->hlist);
- cleanup_p = old_p;
- } else if (old_p == p) {
- /* Only one kprobe element in the hash list */
- arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
- hlist_del_rcu(&p->hlist);
- cleanup_p = p;
+ cleanup_p = 1;
} else {
list_del_rcu(&p->list);
- cleanup_p = NULL;
+ cleanup_p = 0;
}
up(&kprobe_mutex);
@@ -524,7 +528,7 @@ void __kprobes unregister_kprobe(struct
module_put(mod);
if (cleanup_p) {
- if (cleanup_p->pre_handler == aggr_pre_handler) {
+ if (p != old_p) {
list_del_rcu(&p->list);
kfree(old_p);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-14 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-13 20:35 [patch 0/4] Kprobes cleanup patches Anil S Keshavamurthy
2005-12-13 20:35 ` [patch 1/4] Kprobes - Enable funcions only for required arch Anil S Keshavamurthy
2005-12-13 20:35 ` [patch 2/4] Kprobes - cleanup include_asm_kprobes_h Anil S Keshavamurthy
2005-12-13 20:35 ` [patch 3/4] Kprobes - Changed from using spinlock to mutext Anil S Keshavamurthy
2005-12-14 23:50 ` Keshavamurthy Anil S [this message]
2005-12-13 20:35 ` [patch 4/4] Kprobes Cleanup arch_remove_kprobe Anil S Keshavamurthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051214155059.A5350@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=systemtap@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.