From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Iozone <capps@iozone.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
cel@citi.umich.edu, wli@holomorphy.com,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Re: An interesting performance thing ?
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:14:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051215161431.GA21043@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02f001c6018d$56b31030$1500000a@americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 09:36:37AM -0600, Iozone wrote:
> With IP_HASHBITS = 8, there were 256 queues,
> but only one was active. If the hash distribution were
> uniform, then the queue depth could have been 1 (one)
> but instead is a linear search of a relatively large number
> of items.
>
> Does that help ?
I'm mainly curious how much effort it's worth expending on optimizing
that hash. If it turns out that even the current linear search isn't
that expensive, then that's an argument against doing any more
optimizing (beyond just fixing the current obvious problem).
So maybe playing with oprofile or something would help answer my
question.
--b.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-15 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-14 18:22 An interesting performance thing ? Iozone
2005-12-14 22:26 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-14 22:46 ` Chuck Lever
2005-12-14 23:47 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 0:02 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-15 0:43 ` Chuck Lever
2005-12-15 0:57 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-15 0:59 ` Chuck Lever
2005-12-16 10:15 ` Aurélien Charbon
2005-12-16 14:23 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 2:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2005-12-15 4:51 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 14:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2005-12-15 15:36 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 16:14 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2005-12-15 16:41 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 17:07 ` J. Bruce Fields
2005-12-16 1:25 ` Neil Brown
2005-12-16 3:59 ` Iozone
2005-12-14 22:50 ` Iozone
2005-12-15 2:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051215161431.GA21043@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=capps@iozone.org \
--cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.