From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:31:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051219043136.GI23384@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0512182327280.3446@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
> Perhaps it's the smaller structures, as Ingo said, which would allow for
> better cache handling.
That still doesn't seem credible on a large cached x86 CPU.
However if it's that then oprofile could tell I guess.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-19 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-19 1:34 [patch 00/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 4:22 ` Andi Kleen
2005-12-19 4:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 4:31 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-12-19 6:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 12:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-19 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 19:25 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 16:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-10 10:28 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-10 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-01-11 6:33 ` Balbir Singh
2006-01-11 9:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2005-12-19 20:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-12-19 20:32 ` Russell King
2005-12-19 20:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 19:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-19 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-19 23:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-20 8:03 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 8:21 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-20 8:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-20 8:48 ` Nick Piggin
2005-12-19 16:22 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051219043136.GI23384@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.