From: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Singleton <dsingleton@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: Recursion bug in -rt
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:20:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051220155004.GA3906@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051220131956.GA24408@elte.hu>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:19:56PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> hm, i'm looking at -rf4 - these changes look fishy:
>
> - _raw_spin_lock(&lock_owner(lock)->task->pi_lock);
> + if (current != lock_owner(lock)->task)
> + _raw_spin_lock(&lock_owner(lock)->task->pi_lock);
>
> why is this done?
>
Ingo, this is to prevent a kernel hang due to application error.
Basically when an application does a pthread_mutex_lock twice on a
_nonrecursive_ mutex with robust/PI attributes the whole system hangs.
Ofcourse the application clearly should not be doing anything like
that, but it should not end up hanging the system either
-Dinakar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-20 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-14 22:39 Recursion bug in -rt Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-12-15 1:03 ` david singleton
2005-12-15 19:44 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-12-15 20:40 ` David Singleton
2005-12-16 0:02 ` david singleton
2005-12-16 18:42 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-12-16 21:26 ` David Singleton
2005-12-19 11:56 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-12-19 20:11 ` David Singleton
2005-12-15 19:00 ` David Singleton
2005-12-15 19:52 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-12-20 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-20 15:50 ` Dinakar Guniguntala [this message]
2005-12-20 17:43 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-12-20 19:33 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 20:42 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-12-20 21:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 21:55 ` david singleton
2005-12-20 22:56 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-12-20 23:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-12-20 23:55 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-12-22 4:37 ` david singleton
2005-12-20 22:43 ` Esben Nielsen
2005-12-20 22:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-03 1:54 ` david singleton
2006-01-05 2:14 ` david singleton
2006-01-05 9:43 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-01-05 17:11 ` david singleton
2006-01-05 17:47 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-01-05 18:26 ` david singleton
2006-01-07 2:40 ` robust futex deadlock detection patch david singleton
[not found] ` <a36005b50601071145y7e2ead9an4a4ca7896f35a85e@mail.gmail.com>
2006-01-07 19:49 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-01-09 9:23 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-01-09 20:01 ` David Singleton
2006-01-09 20:16 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-01-09 21:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-09 21:19 ` Esben Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051220155004.GA3906@in.ibm.com \
--to=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dsingleton@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.