From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] mutex subsystem, add atomic_*_call_if_*() to i386
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:32:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051221203243.GA19082@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512211054450.4827@g5.osdl.org>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:57:40AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Actually (and re-reading the email I sent that wasn't obvious at all), my
> _preferred_ fix is to literally force the use of the above kind of
> function: not save/restore %eax at all, but just say that any function
> that is called by the magic "atomic_*_call_if()" needs to always return
> the argument it gets as its return value too.
>
> That allows the caller to not even have to care. And the callee obviously
> already _has_ that value, so it might as well return it (and in the best
> case it's not going to add any cost at all, either to the caller or the
> callee).
>
> So you might opt to keep the asm the same, just change the calling
> conventions.
This new macro is only going to be used in x86-specific files, right?
There's no practical way to implement this on lots of other
architectures.
Embedding a call in asm("") can break other things too - for instance,
unwind tables could become inaccurate.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-21 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-21 15:54 [patch 3/8] mutex subsystem, add atomic_*_call_if_*() to i386 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 18:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-21 20:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 20:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-12-21 20:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2005-12-22 9:18 ` Keith Owens
2005-12-21 19:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-21 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-21 22:37 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051221203243.GA19082@nevyn.them.org \
--to=dan@debian.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jes@trained-monkey.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.