From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: ipt_limit patch for iptables-1.3.1 and linux-2.4.22 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:19:51 -0800 Message-ID: <20051223201951.GA28723@linuxace.com> References: <5210898791.20051223141249@uu3.net> <43ABFE4B.6040102@cineca.it> <3519928555.20051223164319@uu3.net> <43AC4F57.8090702@trash.net> <036110574.20051223211301@uu3.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: borg@uu3.net Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <036110574.20051223211301@uu3.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:13:01PM +0100, borg@uu3.net wrote: > Well.. patching only kernel or only userland is pointless indeed. > I still dont understand "brakes userspace" > I assume that we patch both iptables + kernel. new kernel + old userspace = broken old kernel + new userspace = broken > Where is the problem then? comprehension Phil