From: Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: read returns EAGAIN on a _blocking_ socket, but should not?
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:16:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051225151611.GA20443@schmorp.de> (raw)
Hi!
The SuS documents EAGAIN for read(2) as:
[EAGAIN]
The O_NONBLOCK flag is set for the file descriptor and the thread would
be delayed.
And the linux manpage for read(2) says something similar. Yet, I do get
EAGAIN when reading from a blocking socket. Here is a short strace:
socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3
connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/serv"}, 110) = 0
write(3, "\0\3", 2) = 2
write(3, "NEW", 3) = 3
... many writes and reads omitted
sendmsg(3, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\0", 1}], msg_controllen=20, {cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, {3}}, msg_flags=MSG_OOB|MSG_DONTROUTE}, 0) = 1
read(3, "\0\3", 2) = 2
read(3, 0x51d030, 3) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
write(2, "protocol error: unexpected eof f"..., 44) = 44
(the sendmsg call in the source, incidentally, specifies "0" as flags
argument, not MSG_OOB|MSG_DONTROUTE, but this is likely irrelevant).
Here is the server side for the last exchange above:
recvmsg(9, {msg_name(0)=NULL, msg_iov(1)=[{"\0", 1}], msg_controllen=24, {cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=SCM_RIGHTS, {10}}, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 1
... ioctls on other fds omitted
write(9, "\0\3", 2) = 2
write(9, "END", 3) = 3
Now, the first backtrace creates a unix domain socket, connects to an
existing one, passes a file descriptor and then read() returns with
EAGAIN. Nowhere does it set the socket to blocking.
The full backtraces can be found as http://data.plan9.de/x.20407 (client
getting EAGAIN) and at http://data.plan9.de/x.20406 (server writing).
I am looking for the obvious logical error I made, but I can only
come up with the conclusion that read returning EAGAIN on a blocking
socket must be a kernel bug. It is also interesting that this code and
the server/client exchanges worked reliably _until_ I started to pass
filehandles from client to server.
I am using linux 2.6.14 on x86_64.
Thanks for your time and any insights you can give!
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ pcg@goof.com
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-25 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-25 15:16 Marc Lehmann [this message]
2005-12-25 16:17 ` read returns EAGAIN on a _blocking_ socket, but should not? (solved) Marc Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051225151611.GA20443@schmorp.de \
--to=schmorp@schmorp.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.