From: Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:04:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051230000400.GS18040@outflux.net> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 622 bytes --]
Would patches towards adding missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION, MODULE_VERSION,
and MODULE_AUTHOR stuff be taken? While these aren't covered in the
CodingStyle document, I did find reference to their preferred order in
Documentation/i2c/porting-clients.txt where Greg KH said the order
should be:
MODULE_AUTHOR
MODULE_DESCRIPTION
MODULE_LICENSE /* last line of source */
I'm curious where MODULE_VERSION should go, as well as
MODULE_PARAM_DESC.
Notably, AUTHOR, DESCRIPTION, and VERSION seem to be missing from the
various examples in Documention/
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next reply other threads:[~2005-12-30 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-30 0:04 Kees Cook [this message]
2006-01-04 1:13 ` [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs Greg KH
2006-01-04 5:18 ` Kees Cook
2006-01-04 5:43 ` Greg KH
2006-01-08 20:45 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Alexey Dobriyan
2006-01-08 20:45 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-01-08 21:55 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
2006-01-08 21:55 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
2006-01-08 21:58 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Greg KH
2006-01-08 21:58 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Greg KH
2006-01-08 22:32 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:32 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:33 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:33 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:03 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-08 22:03 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-08 23:41 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Håkon Løvdal
2006-01-08 23:41 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Håkon Løvdal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051230000400.GS18040@outflux.net \
--to=kees@outflux.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.