* [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT?
@ 2005-12-30 10:01 Peter Magnusson
2005-12-30 11:06 ` Denis Ovsienko
2006-01-04 5:42 ` Peter Magnusson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Magnusson @ 2005-12-30 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
I'll take it from the begining... About one year ago I only had 1 IP and
used wondershaper. It worked great. Now I got /27 (32 IPs) and a gw
computer that talks to two ISPs via a two tunnels. See:
http://www.flashdance.cx/pics/flashdance-LAN.png
I _really_ have a need to do QoS on my connection, for example I host
websites that uses all available upstream. When I download at the same time
it cant respond to ACK's fast enough so get very slow download speed. Its
also ADSL that I got so I got nice long buffers at my ISPs DSLAMs that
shouldnt be filled.
I have tried to figure out how to write QoS rules that did what I wanted,
it didnt work very well. My gw have over 100 TCP connections every given
moment and there is bunch of people that will be affected (not counting
web/ftp/mail/dns requests) if it goes down or misbehaves. So I dont have
any desire to play with QoS to much on the gw box. I have tried to search
for a QoS script that I could modify and use but more or less ALL scripts
expects that you are using NAT (which Im not, I hate NAT. Guess why I got
32 real IPs) or just got one computer. All scripts that I have found
does QoS based on port, not IP. I use different IPs for different services,
so I wanna do QoS based on IP, not the port.
What I need is a script that sets a high priority on ACK's, all UDP traffic
by default. Then I want to have different priority on diffrent IPs, all IPs
should have a max available and a min available bandwidth that they could
use, in case all upstream bandwidth are used (thats the normal condition).
And, that works when there is a computer that are a gateway that just
forwards all traffic from one interface to an other. Basicly, Im asking
if someone got a such script for me that I could use as a base and just
add which IPs that should have so or so max and min bandwidth? I cant be
the only one on earth that would be needing a such thing. This is the first
question.
The second question is, which interface should I do QoS on?
My gw computer (are using FC3, Linux 2.6):
eth0 = my LAN
eth1 = ISP1
eth2 = ISP2
tun0 = tunnel that goes over ISP1
tun1 = tunnel that goes over ISP2
teql0 = the upstream of ISP1 and ISP2 added together, later splits into
tun0 and tun1
computer at my LAN -> eth0 -> teql0 -> tun0 -> eth1
(one example of how a packet would go...)
Question is: Should I do QoS at eth0? At eth0 and teql0? Just teql0?
Help is highly appreciated.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT?
2005-12-30 10:01 [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT? Peter Magnusson
@ 2005-12-30 11:06 ` Denis Ovsienko
2006-01-04 5:42 ` Peter Magnusson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Denis Ovsienko @ 2005-12-30 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
> one computer. All scripts that I have found does QoS based on port,
> not IP. I use different IPs for different services, so I wanna do QoS
> based on IP, not the port.
Does u32 filter syntax make any problem doing so?
> What I need is a script that sets a high priority on ACK's, all UDP
> traffic by default. Then I want to have different priority on diffrent
> IPs, all IPs should have a max available and a min available bandwidth
> that they could use, in case all upstream bandwidth are used (thats
http://rentacoder.com/
--
DO4-UANIC
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT?
2005-12-30 10:01 [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT? Peter Magnusson
2005-12-30 11:06 ` Denis Ovsienko
@ 2006-01-04 5:42 ` Peter Magnusson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Magnusson @ 2006-01-04 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, Denis Ovsienko wrote:
>> one computer. All scripts that I have found does QoS based on port,
>> not IP. I use different IPs for different services, so I wanna do QoS
>> based on IP, not the port.
> Does u32 filter syntax make any problem doing so?
u32 filter syntax? And that is the syntax that tc uses or what?
I have tried several scripts, they kinda expect that you use NAT and I
have tried to modify them to make it work for my setup. But I couldnt get
it to work like it should. Could you recommend any script for doing QoS
that I should take a look on and see if I could use it?
Yes I have tried to write a QoS script from scratch but it that didnt
work either :(
>> What I need is a script that sets a high priority on ACK's, all UDP
>> traffic by default. Then I want to have different priority on diffrent
>> IPs, all IPs should have a max available and a min available bandwidth
>> that they could use, in case all upstream bandwidth are used (thats
> http://rentacoder.com/
But doesnt it already exist an already made script that can do what I want?
Just that I havent found it yet. Maybe someone on this list knows if it
does?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-04 5:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-30 10:01 [LARTC] QoS script for gw without NAT? Peter Magnusson
2005-12-30 11:06 ` Denis Ovsienko
2006-01-04 5:42 ` Peter Magnusson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.