From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsTEi-0000EW-Cp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:00:36 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EsTEf-0000DZ-VX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:00:35 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EsTEf-0000DV-Tg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:00:33 -0500
Received: from [65.74.133.5] (helo=mail.codesourcery.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EsTFG-0000v8-FD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2005 18:01:10 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu optimizations for x86
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:58:56 +0000
References: <200512301645.11390.joseph@tidetamerboatlifts.com>
In-Reply-To: <200512301645.11390.joseph@tidetamerboatlifts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200512302258.56990.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Friday 30 December 2005 21:45, Joseph Miller wrote:
> I have been using an compiler-optimized version of qemu for several weeks
> now on an x86 with much success.  Qemu has not crashed one single time and
> I have seen a noticeable performance increase.

Do you have any actual performance numbers?

Why are these x86 specific?

Paul