From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
Subject: Re: "condition" patch for kernel 2.6
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:26:01 +0100
Message-ID: <200601021126.01923@nienna>
References: <3115d56e05092604391bef627d@mail.gmail.com>
	<200509261500.55328@nienna> <43B8533E.6050901@arcoscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <43B8533E.6050901@arcoscom.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Samuel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=EDaz_Garc=EDa?= <samueldg@arcoscom.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org


  Hi,

On Sunday 01 January 2006 23.10, Samuel D=EDaz Garc=EDa wrote:
> Don't need any patch for iptables?

  It's included in the latest iptables release. For older iptables versio=
ns=20
(1.2.x) you should use the same patch for 2.4 as for 2.6.

--=20
 Regards,
  Krisztian Kovacs