All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: gcoady@gmail.com, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:14:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060102201429.GB32464@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512300849590.3298@g5.osdl.org>


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:

> > have you applied the zlib patches too? In particular this one should 
> > make a difference:
> > 
> >     http://redhat.com/~mingo/latency-tracing-patches/patches/reduce-zlib-stack-hack.patch
> > 
> > If you didnt have this applied, could you apply it and retry with 
> > stack-footprint-debugging again?
> 
> Ingo, instead of having a static work area and using locking, why not 
> just move those fields into the "z_stream" structure, and thus make 
> them be per-stream? The z_stream structure should already be allocated 
> with kmalloc() or similar by the caller, so that also gets it off the 
> stack without the locking thing.
> 
> Hmm?

yeah, i'll implement that. The above one was just a quick hack that 
somehow survived. (and i am definitely a wimp when it comes to changing 
zlib internals :-)

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-02 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-27 23:31 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2005-12-28  2:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-28 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-29  0:00   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29  8:22     ` [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 10:02       ` Dave Jones
2005-12-29 10:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 20:11           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:26             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:28               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 22:18                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  0:08                 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  0:18                   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  0:42                     ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  8:09                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 16:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-02 20:14                       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2006-01-19  1:49                         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  6:17                           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:20                     ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  2:16                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  8:00                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 18:51                     ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:51                     ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:59                       ` Mark Knecht
2005-12-31  1:16                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:30                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:02                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31  1:15                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:39                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31  3:54                             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  4:00                             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  4:29                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31  4:54                                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 20:14                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-01  5:46                                     ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 18:56                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01 19:02                                         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 19:06                                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-03 11:12                                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 13:28                                           ` David Lang
2006-01-03 14:11                                             ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 14:09                                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 15:55                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31  4:48                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01  8:32                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 20:28       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29  0:54   ` 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2006-01-19  1:42   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  7:29     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-19  7:32       ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  7:35       ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060102201429.GB32464@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcoady@gmail.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.