All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	paulmck@us.ibm.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	vatsa@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:41:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060103141101.GC5075@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0601030524570.30559@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:28:15AM -0800, David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> 
> >I do agree that the two layers of batching really makes things
> >subtle. I think the best we can do is to figure out some way of
> >automatic throttling in RCU and forced quiescent state under extreme
> >conditions. That way we will have less dependency on softirq
> >throttling.
> 
> would it make sense to have the RCU subsystems with a threshold so that 
> when more then X items are outstanding they trigger a premption of all 
> other CPU's ASAP (forceing the scheduling break needed to make progress on 
> clearing RCU)? This wouldn't work in all cases, but it could significantly 
> reduce the problem situations.

Yes, I think it would make sense to try something like that. See Paul's earlier
mail in this thread for an example code snippet.

Thanks
Dipankar

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-03 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-27 23:31 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2005-12-28  2:46 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-28 22:59 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-29  0:00   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29  8:22     ` [patch] latency tracer, 2.6.15-rc7 Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 10:02       ` Dave Jones
2005-12-29 10:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 20:11           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:26             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29 20:28               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-29 22:18                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  0:08                 ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  0:18                   ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  0:42                     ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  8:09                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 16:51                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-02 20:14                       ` Ingo Molnar
2006-01-19  1:49                         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  6:17                           ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:20                     ` Grant Coady
2005-12-30  2:16                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-30  8:00                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-12-30 18:51                     ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:51                     ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  0:59                       ` Mark Knecht
2005-12-31  1:16                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:30                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:02                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31  1:15                         ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  1:39                           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-31  3:54                             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  4:00                             ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31  4:29                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31  4:54                                 ` Lee Revell
2005-12-31 20:14                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-01  5:46                                     ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 18:56                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01 19:02                                         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-01 19:06                                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-03 11:12                                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 13:28                                           ` David Lang
2006-01-03 14:11                                             ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2006-01-03 14:09                                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2006-01-03 15:55                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-12-31  4:48                               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-01  8:32                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 20:28       ` Lee Revell
2005-12-29  0:54   ` 2.6.15-rc5: latency regression vs 2.6.14 in exit_mmap->free_pgtables Lee Revell
2006-01-19  1:42   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  7:29     ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-19  7:32       ` Lee Revell
2006-01-19  7:35       ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060103141101.GC5075@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.