From: Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 05:18:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104051816.GC6720@outflux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051230000400.GS18040@outflux.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 987 bytes --]
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 08:27:09PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> I said that? Hm, looks like Jean did, not I :)
Oh, whoops. I scrolled up just enough to find your name. ;)
> > Notably, AUTHOR, DESCRIPTION, and VERSION seem to be missing from the
> > various examples in Documention/
>
> What examples?
i2c/porting-clients (instructions, rather than code)
i2c/writing-clients (same)
sound/alsa/DocBook/writing-an-alsa-driver.tmpl
firmware_class/firmware_sample_driver.c
firmware_class/firmware_sample_firmware_class.c
connector/cn_test.c
DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl (not really an example, more a description)
DocBook/videobook.tmpl
DocBook/procfs_example.c
kprobes.txt
What I was really in the mood for was adding those things to the rest of
the code tree too. There are plenty of modules that have authors,
versions, and descriptions listed in comments and #define's, but not
marked up in MODULE_*() syntax.
--
Kees Cook @outflux.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 5:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-30 0:04 [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs Kees Cook
2006-01-04 1:13 ` Greg KH
2006-01-04 5:18 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2006-01-04 5:43 ` Greg KH
2006-01-08 20:45 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Alexey Dobriyan
2006-01-08 20:45 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-01-08 21:55 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
2006-01-08 21:55 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Carlos Manuel Duclos Vergara
2006-01-08 21:58 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Greg KH
2006-01-08 21:58 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Greg KH
2006-01-08 22:32 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:32 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:33 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:33 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matt Domsch
2006-01-08 22:03 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-08 22:03 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Matthew Wilcox
2006-01-08 23:41 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* Håkon Løvdal
2006-01-08 23:41 ` MODULE_VERSION useless? (was Re: [KJ] adding missing MODULE_* stuffs) Håkon Løvdal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060104051816.GC6720@outflux.net \
--to=kees@outflux.net \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.