From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 18:17:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104171710.GQ3831@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490601040910q50655fc1sbdef48c8bd3d02d4@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:10:45PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 1/4/06, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 05:49:25PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > To get maximum testing making 4KSTACKS default Y and removing the "if
> > > DEBUG_KERNEL" conditional just seems to me to be the obvious choice...
> >
> > With my version, we are getting the bigger testing coverage - and
> > getting a big testing coverage in -mm is what we need if we want to know
> > whether we have really already fixed all stack problems or whether
> > there are any left.
> >
> Ok, I guess I didn't make myself as clear as I thought.
> What I meant was that if 4K stacks are always enabled by default, then
> you'll get more testing than if only people who enable DEBUG_KERNEL
> are able to turn it on.
>...
This is not what my patch does.
Please apply my patch, use DEBUG_KERNEL=n and you'll understand it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 14:51 [-mm patch] i386: enable 4k stacks by default Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:39 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:44 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 16:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 16:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 17:10 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 17:17 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-04 21:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-04 20:53 ` Grant Coady
2006-01-04 21:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-04 22:24 ` Grant Coady
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 17:54 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-14 2:09 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 19:19 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-28 21:18 ` Zan Lynx
2007-04-30 3:58 ` David Chinner
2007-04-30 8:17 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-30 10:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 10:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 12:13 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 17:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:22 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 18:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-30 18:51 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-30 8:55 ` Neil Brown
2007-04-30 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 11:30 ` Jens Axboe
2007-04-30 23:24 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-01 8:01 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060104171710.GQ3831@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.