From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751869AbWAEDOI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:14:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751889AbWAEDOH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:14:07 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:55491 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869AbWAEDOG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:14:06 -0500 From: Roman Zippel To: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/41] m68k: fix macro syntax to make current binutils happy Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 04:11:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601050412.16136.zippel@linux-m68k.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wednesday 04 January 2006 00:27, Al Viro wrote: > recent as(1) doesn't think that . terminates a macro name, so > getuser.l is _not_ treated as invoking getuser with .l as the > first argument. Al, please don't send the binutils patches yet, I simply need more time to figure out how to deal with it and it's not a critical patch. Linus, please don't apply patch 8 and 9. bye, Roman