All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy TARREAU <willy@w.ods.org>
To: "jürgen baumann" <jbaumann@is-kassel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.33pre1 kernel/sysctl.c missing spin_unlock()
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:07:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060105220719.GA618@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BD3AB7.9020003@is-kassel.org>

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 04:26:47PM +0100, jürgen baumann wrote:
> possibly fixed yet, but maybe not:
> 
> in above patch there was a spinlock(&sysctl_lock) added in 
> function do_register_sysctl_table(), but no corresponding 
> spin_unlock() before return.
> 
> after starting the new kernel (unfortunately with further 
> patches), it hangs on trying to start the kswapd-thread.
> 
> after inserting the spin_unlock() all run fine.

Can you be more specific ? First, there's no function named
like this in 2.4.33-pre1. The most approaching change I can
find lies in kernel/sysctl.c:register_sysctl_table() and this
one uses valid locking :

struct ctl_table_header *register_sysctl_table(ctl_table * table, 
                                               int insert_at_head)
{
        struct ctl_table_header *tmp;
        tmp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ctl_table_header), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!tmp)
                return NULL;
        tmp->ctl_table = table;
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp->ctl_entry);
        tmp->used = 0;
        tmp->unregistering = NULL;
===>    spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
        if (insert_at_head)
                list_add(&tmp->ctl_entry, &root_table_header.ctl_entry);
        else
                list_add_tail(&tmp->ctl_entry, &root_table_header.ctl_entry);
===>    spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
        register_proc_table(table, proc_sys_root, tmp);
#endif
        return tmp;
}

So possibly you found one real bug, but please tell us where you
had to patch !

Thanks in advance,
Willy


      reply	other threads:[~2006-01-05 22:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-05 15:26 2.4.33pre1 kernel/sysctl.c missing spin_unlock() jürgen baumann
2006-01-05 22:07 ` Willy TARREAU [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060105220719.GA618@w.ods.org \
    --to=willy@w.ods.org \
    --cc=jbaumann@is-kassel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.