All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Robert Jones <rowjones@cs.indiana.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.13.4 aacraid: Partitioning array makes adapter go "dead"
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:19:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060107141933.GJ3774@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <435BF66B.7040508@cs.indiana.edu>

On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 03:45:31PM -0500, Robert Jones wrote:

>...
> Here's some information regarding the machine I'm having the problem with:
> 2-Way Dual-Core AMD Opteron 275's
> 8GB Reg ECC
> Tyan 2882-D (K8SD-Pro) motherboard (AMD-8000 series chipset)
> 2 Seagate ST336754LC's, updated to latest firmware (0004)
> Adaptec 2230S (updated to latest firmware, 8205)
> 
> The machine boots wonderfully with any kernel I have tried (2.6.9,
> 2.6.12.9, 2.6.13.4, 2.6.14-rc5; all kernels are vanilla kernels) and
> binds the array to /dev/sda, so long as the array is unpartitioned.
> Here's what the kernel reports when booting:

Is this problem still present in kernel 2.6.15?

> SCSI device sda: 71619584 512-byte hdwr sectors (36669 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: got wrong page
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
> SCSI device sda: 71619584 512-byte hdwr sectors (36669 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: got wrong page
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
>   sda: unknown partition table
> Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
> Attached scsi generic sg0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0,  type 0
> 
> -----------
> 
> However, once I partition the array things begin to go wrong. While the
> partitioning succeeds, any point after this aacraid will state the
> controller is "dead". Here's what the kernel is telling me at this point:
> 
> -----------
> 
> SCSI device sda: 71619584 512-byte hdwr sectors (36669 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: got wrong page
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
>   sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
> SCSI device sda: 71619584 512-byte hdwr sectors (36669 MB)
> sda: Write Protect is off
> sda: Mode Sense: 03 00 00 00
> sda: got wrong page
> sda: assuming drive cache: write through
>   sda: sda1 sda2 sda3
> 
> -----------
> 
> This looks fine too, however, when I reboot or try to access the array
> directly such as a mke2fs /dev/sda1, the kernel says this:
> 
> -----------
> 
> aacraid: Host adapter reset request. SCSI hang ?
> aacraid: Host adapter appears dead
> scsi: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery: host 0 channel 0
> id 0 lun 0
> sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x6000000
> end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 63
> Buffer I/O error on device sda1, logical block 0
> scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
> Buffer I/O error on device sda1, logical block 0
> scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
> Buffer I/O error on device sda1, logical block 64
> scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
> Buffer I/O error on device sda1, logical block 64
> 
> -----------
> 
> The same machine will install Win2K w/ Adaptec's driver just fine, so I
> think the hardware is okay. I went ahead and pulled Adaptec's "official"
> aacraid implementation and replaced the "vanilla" implementation in
> 2.6.9 with it. Unfortunately, this did not seem to help.
> 
> Also, if I remove the partitions aacraid is happy again and will bind
> the array into /dev/sda as before. It's only after partitioning do
> things go bad.
>...
> Thanks,
> Robert

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-07 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-23 20:45 2.6.13.4 aacraid: Partitioning array makes adapter go "dead" Robert Jones
2006-01-07 14:19 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-07 15:44   ` Martin Drab
2006-01-07 16:30     ` Martin Drab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060107141933.GJ3774@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rowjones@cs.indiana.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.