From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: IT3 Stuart Blake Tener <teners@bh90210.net>
Cc: Douglas Cole <doug.n7bfs@gmail.com>, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Most "HAM" friendly distro ?
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 18:43:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060107174316.GA756@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136410009.43bc3d99a19e0@mgtmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 04:26:49PM -0500, IT3 Stuart Blake Tener wrote:
> > Well as most recent postings seem to indicate some distro's are less
> > friendly than others for updating and changing kernels and other
> > things.
> > I too am using SuSE (version 10) for my desktop OS, but still have a
> > separate pc running SuSE 8.2 for packet, since it is the one that
> > works for me, and as has been posted on here many times, 2.6 kernel
> > packet issues have been many.
>
> My desktop OS is MacOS, and when the new Mac/Intel machines come out, I will
> purchase one and run Linux as a secondary OS, since AX.25 is not supported by
> MacOS, and cannot be added either.
For MacOS and others you may consider one of the integrated AX.25 stack
and apps like JNOS, Wampes or similar. I consider those conceptually a
bad thing - but certainly they're easy to setup and consistent across a
wide variety of operating systems.
73 de DL5RB op Ralf
--
Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-07 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 20:55 Most "HAM" friendly distro ? Douglas Cole
2006-01-04 21:26 ` IT3 Stuart Blake Tener
2006-01-04 23:28 ` Alex Flinsch
2006-01-07 17:43 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB [this message]
2006-01-04 23:09 ` Nate Bargmann
2006-01-04 23:19 ` Jeremy Utley
2006-01-05 1:31 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-05 2:14 ` Nate Bargmann
2006-01-04 23:46 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-05 0:40 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-06 13:15 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:19 ` Margaret Leber
2006-01-06 14:26 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:58 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-06 17:11 ` K. David Prince
2006-01-06 17:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-05 0:27 ` Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2006-01-05 1:08 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-05 1:29 ` Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2006-01-05 3:21 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-05 4:36 ` Curt Mills
2006-01-05 7:07 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:37 ` Curt, WE7U
2006-01-06 17:39 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-06 17:51 ` Curt, WE7U
2006-01-07 15:03 ` Most 'HAM' " w9ya
2006-01-06 23:27 ` Most "HAM" " Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-07 2:10 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-07 9:11 ` Ian Haver
2006-01-07 14:10 ` Nate Bargmann
2006-01-07 19:38 ` Curt Mills
2006-01-07 19:19 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2006-01-09 12:01 ` stephen
2006-01-09 12:41 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-09 13:08 ` Nate Bargmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 2:26 Adam Vazquez Kb2jpd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060107174316.GA756@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=doug.n7bfs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=teners@bh90210.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.