All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] RTC subsystem, proc interface
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 03:04:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060109030433.581c49e7@inspiron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601082056.30227.dtor_core@ameritech.net>

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:56:29 -0500
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> wrote:

> > +static void rtc_proc_remove_device(struct class_device *class_dev,
> > +                                             struct class_interface *class_intf)
> > +{
> > +       down(&rtc_sem);
> > +       if (rtc_dev == class_dev) {
> > +               remove_proc_entry("driver/rtc", NULL);
> > +               rtc_dev = NULL;
> > +       }
> > +       up(&rtc_sem);
> > +}
> 
> What if I happen to remove (unregister) rtc devices in order other
> than they were registered in? You need a counter there instead of
> storing the first device created.

 Only the first device that registers will get the /proc/driver/rtc
 entry, which will be removed when the driver unregisters.

 /proc/driver/rtc is a legacy interface, thus supporting it
 for more than one RTC is useless. Any system that uses
 more than one RTCs should access them via /dev/rtcX or
 via sysfs.


-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-09  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-08 23:12 [PATCH 0/8] RTC subsystem Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 1/8] RTC subsystem, class Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 2/8] RTC subsystem, ARM cleanup Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 3/8] RTC subsystem, sysfs interface Alessandro Zummo
     [not found]   ` <200601082102.40992.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
2006-01-09  2:13     ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 4/8] RTC subsystem, proc interface Alessandro Zummo
     [not found]   ` <200601082056.30227.dtor_core@ameritech.net>
2006-01-09  2:04     ` Alessandro Zummo [this message]
2006-01-09  2:50       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 5/8] RTC subsystem, dev interface Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-09  2:50   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-09  3:12     ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-09  6:39       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-01-09  9:14         ` Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 6/8] RTC subsystem, X1205 driver Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 7/8] RTC subsystem, test device/driver Alessandro Zummo
2006-01-08 23:12 ` [PATCH 8/8] RTC subsystem, DS1672 driver Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060109030433.581c49e7@inspiron \
    --to=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.