From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751238AbWAITiJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:38:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751254AbWAITiI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:38:08 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:62339 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbWAITiH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:38:07 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: "Lu, Yinghai" Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] add x86-64 support for memory hot-add Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:37:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: "keith" , "Matt Tolentino" , akpm@osdl.org, discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42030949CF@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> In-Reply-To: <6F7DA19D05F3CF40B890C7CA2DB13A42030949CF@ssvlexmb2.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601092037.42840.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 09 January 2006 20:28, Lu, Yinghai wrote: > I don't know, even yes, according to BKDG, you still need to update > related Routing Table in NB. I don't really want any memory controller or HT routing touching code in the kernel. It would be far too fragile. Pushing that work over to firmware using ACPI seems like the right thing to do. -Andi