From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: merging initial part of a branch? Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:01:52 -0500 Message-ID: <20060113200152.GI4369@fieldses.org> References: <20060111230451.GH8618@fieldses.org> <7vek3epbs9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060112005531.GB14599@fieldses.org> <7vmzi2i5eu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060113030837.GD27214@fieldses.org> <7v8xtkhj5l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060113151005.GA29804@fieldses.org> <7v4q477vqj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 13 21:05:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExVAc-00061G-3G for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:05:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422875AbWAMUDc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:03:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422905AbWAMUCJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:02:09 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:40157 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422878AbWAMUBy (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:01:54 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ExV7Q-0002cq-QK; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:01:52 -0500 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v4q477vqj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:50:44AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "J. Bruce Fields" writes: > but the general sentiment was that having another document is > making things more confusing and we should try to clarify the > main documentation instead. Understood. We may need to add documentation here and there, but that needs to be done alongside clarifying the existing text and organization, and without creating unnecessary duplication. > So I would really appreciate documentaiotn patches to clarify > the current mess ;-). OK. I'll see if I can up with something useful! > > I also have Yet Another Git Tutorial, at > > http://www.fieldses.org/~bfields/kernel/git.html. (Corrections and > > suggestions welcomed.) > > The $prefix defaults to $HOME/bin/. Having $bindir on $PATH > ought to be enough and exporting GIT_EXEC_PATH is not needd. > > Other than that I did not see anything obviously wrong, although > I suspect you did not intend to say clone with stgit. Whoops, right. Thanks for the corrections; I've applied all three. --b.