From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@mmj.dk>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:57:05 +0000
Subject: Re: Add mlmmj-receive link?
Message-Id: <20060114075705.GM92183@mmj.dk>
List-Id: <mlmmj.mlmmj.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601131924070.20279@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601131924070.20279@e-smith.charlieb.ott.istop.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org

* Charlie Brady <charlieb@budge.apana.org.au> [Jan 14. 2006 01:27]:
> 
> I know from the archives that there are "historical reasons" for 
> mlmmj-recieve being spelled as it is. But is there any reason that it 
> couldn't be installed with two names (via links), and referred to 
> thenceforth via the correct spelling?
> 
> We neither want to teach people bad spelling, nor have good spellers often 
> mistyping the name of the command.
> 
> Or am I missing something?
> 
> If not, I can prepare a patch.

Please do--I'll apply.

-- 
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
 and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
                                 -- A. P. J.