From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fusion - adding support for FC949ES Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20060114113151.GD19567@lst.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:19346 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932181AbWANLb5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:31:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Moore, Eric" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:25:26PM -0700, Moore, Eric wrote: > Add software recognition for the new LSI Logic Fibre Channel controller. > > It relies on patch I posted yesterday: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=113710143305078&w=2 > > Signed-off-by: Eric Moore > > diff -uarN b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c > a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c > --- b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c 2006-01-13 13:51:07.000000000 > -0700 > +++ a/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c 2006-01-13 15:42:07.000000000 > -0700 > @@ -1378,6 +1378,10 @@ > ioc->bus_type = FC; > ioc->errata_flag_1064 = 1; > } > + else if (pdev->device == MPI_MANUFACTPAGE_DEVICEID_FC949E) { > + ioc->prod_name = "LSIFC949E"; > + ioc->bus_type = FC; > + } > else if (pdev->device == MPI_MANUFACTPAGE_DEVID_53C1030) { Why is this (and the existing ids) using the ids from the lsi/ headers and not from pci_ids.h? looks a bit inconsistant, but let's go for this variant for now..