From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:02:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4174165.4BIyCygvf0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601152002.36397.kisda@domain.hid> Subject: [Xenomai-core] anonymous user-space tasks (again) List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches, discussions\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: xenomai@xenomai.org --nextPart4174165.4BIyCygvf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I tested Philipp's fix "Allow creating anon user-space tasks" [1][2] with Xenomai 2.1-RC2/2.6.15/x86 (2.0.3 should behave the same). anon rt_task_shadow: 2.0.1: worked 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXIST) anon rt_task_spawn: 2.0.1: failed with ESRCH (-3) 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXIST) A small program only calling rt_task_shadow with NULL-name fails if i start= it=20 a second time. Error EEXIST (-17). Same for a program calling only=20 rt_task_spawn with NULL-name. There is nothing under /proc/xenomai/registry/* Apropos registry: In the trunk there is no file src/native/registry.c anymore. I do not reall= y=20 miss it, but the API documentation still says these calls can be made from= =20 user-space. Should I create a patch to update the docs? Or should it be=20 there? thank you kisda [1] http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai?rev=3D405&view=3Drev [2] http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/xenomai?rev=3D406&view=3Drev --nextPart4174165.4BIyCygvf0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDypxMIPTw9rIdn6oRArm/AJ9/voD1QV05BV8TfHCagIWxxqLD6wCfaF6y 57XP6TXsgmLbPA2/sdqcn0E= =aJWc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4174165.4BIyCygvf0--