From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
John Ronciak <john.ronciak@gmail.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
Vitaly Bordug <vbordug@ru.mvista.com>,
saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:41:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060118074154.GH19398@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43CD8D72.6040501@pobox.com>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:36:02PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 02:27:16PM -0800, John Ronciak wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Another thing is that removal of the driver (or disabling the config)
> >>will hopefully force the issue in that people with these ARCHs will
> >>use the e100 and if they have problems we can get them fixed in the
> >>e100 driver. At this point nobody seems to be able to define a "real"
> >>problem other than talking about it.
>
> Someone should send me a patch that adds eepro100 to the feature-removal
> doc.
Patch below.
> jeff
cu
Adrian
<-- snip -->
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
--- linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old 2006-01-18 08:38:57.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.15-mm4-full/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt 2006-01-18 08:39:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -164,0 +165,6 @@
+---------------------------
+
+What: eepro100 network driver
+When: April 2006
+Why: replaced by the e100 driver
+Who: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-05 18:18 [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-05 21:04 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-01-15 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-15 13:19 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 18:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-17 22:27 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-18 0:32 ` John W. Linville
2006-01-18 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 7:41 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2006-01-18 10:34 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:08 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 21:32 [2.6 patch] schedule eepro100.c for removal Adrian Bunk
2006-02-03 22:18 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-04 1:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-14 15:22 Adrian Bunk
2006-03-04 2:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-04 11:04 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060118074154.GH19398@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.