From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <olh@suse.de>
Received: from mx1.suse.de (ns.suse.de [195.135.220.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "mx1.suse.de",
	Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK))
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049E36891D
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 23:07:21 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:07:15 +0100
From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Arthur Othieno <apgo@patchbomb.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drop linuxppc64-dev
Message-ID: <20060118120715.GB19765@suse.de>
References: <20060116121244.GB7171@suse.de> <20060118110905.GA23678@krypton>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <20060118110905.GA23678@krypton>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

 On Wed, Jan 18, Arthur Othieno wrote:

> What about the s/linuxppc64\.org/penguinppc\.org/g case? Or is
> penguinppc64.org preferable? Or am I just taking it too far? ;)

They are redirected on DNS or HTTP level.

-- 
short story of a lazy sysadmin:
 alias appserv=wotan