All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_UNWIND_INFO
Date: 20 Jan 2006 07:13:57 +0100
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:13:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120061357.GA62569@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17360.27469.840898.303811@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:47:09PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Andi Kleen writes:
> 
> > The module loader should be discarding these sections on most architectures
> > because there is nothing that needs them and it's just a waste of memory
> > to store them.
> 
> Apparently the module loader loads all sections marked SHF_ALLOC,
> reasonably enough.
> 
> Why would we want the unwind tables in the .ko but not in kernel
> memory?  Isn't the point of this so that we can add an in-kernel
> unwinder?

For most people so far it was for kgdb where they would be needed
on disk only.

-Andi

      reply	other threads:[~2006-01-20  6:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-08 12:59 [PATCH] CONFIG_UNWIND_INFO Jan Beulich
2006-01-14 12:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-14 14:03   ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-01-16  7:36     ` Jan Beulich
2006-01-16  7:46       ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 11:48   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-01-18 15:18     ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-18 15:58       ` Jan Beulich
2006-01-18 16:11         ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-18 16:48           ` Jan Beulich
2006-01-20  4:47       ` Paul Mackerras
2006-01-20  6:13         ` Andi Kleen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060120061357.GA62569@muc.de \
    --to=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.