From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>,
git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Charles Lever <cel@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force"
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:22:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060120182255.GD32177@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137738224.27911.26.camel@dv>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:23:44AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> > That command could be "cat" to get the current "refresh" behaviour, or
> > an editor wrapper acting on stdin/out, or a wrapper to filterdiff, or
> > whatever clever filter one would want to use.
> >
> > Does it sound better ?
>
> Yes. The first step would be to fix "stg refresh --edit --showpatch" to
> actually respect edits made to the patch.
I tend to use stg refresh -es as a quick (well, not quite as quick as
I'd like) way to look at the current patch. Often I leave it up while
I'm working (editing the patched files). So if exiting from stg refresh
-es suddenly started overwriting my working files, I'd be very
unhappy....
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-13 9:24 StGIT: "stg new" vs "stg new --force" Pavel Roskin
2006-01-13 9:34 ` Karl Hasselström
2006-01-16 8:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-17 17:01 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-17 21:57 ` Yann Dirson
2006-01-17 23:16 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-18 19:37 ` Yann Dirson
2006-01-19 0:49 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-19 21:38 ` Yann Dirson
2006-01-20 6:23 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-20 18:22 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2006-01-24 5:30 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-24 17:54 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-01-24 18:17 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-24 21:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-21 18:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-22 5:05 ` Pavel Roskin
2006-01-21 18:20 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-01-21 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060120182255.GD32177@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=cel@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=ydirson@altern.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.