From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mads Martin Joergensen Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:05:19 +0000 Subject: Re: Treatment of Return-Path: headers (Re: mlmmj-recieve silently discarding messages Message-Id: <20060121190519.GA5531@suse.de> List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org * Charlie Brady [Jan 21. 2006 20:03]: > >I've never seen a modern MTA that doesn't implement and use it, it's not > >specific to Sendmail. > > Well qmail does implement it but doesn't use it, so there's one counter > example. But since the header isn't mandated, it's not safe to assume that > will exist for every MTA. One of the stated goals of mlmmj is mail server > independence, so it should be very careful about strict RFC compliance. Sure, but it's possible for every MTA to be configured to add it, and I'd much rather use that one than To: in the mail message. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.