From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>,
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:41:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060121194102.GB28051@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137833547.2978.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 09:52:27AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:41 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's do the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver in 2.6.17.
> > >
> >
> > heh. I was just thinking that I hadn't heard from Badari and Ken in a while.
> >
> > I doubt if this'll fly. We're stuck with it.
>
> One thing we can do is ask the distributions to stop shipping raw first,
> to see what the fallout is (and to give it as a sign that it's an
> obsolete interface). Then a year or two after that....
It's been off in Fedora since FC4.
RHEL4 had it enabled after several vendors complained a lot about its
absense breaking an installed userbase, though they were told it would be
enabled with the proviso that it would go away in the future.
RHEL5 isn't even in beta yet, but I can already hear the voices asking
for it be reenabled..
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-21 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 3:02 [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 3:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 5:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-21 1:08 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-01-21 1:49 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-19 16:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 16:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-19 16:52 ` Mark Lord
2006-01-19 16:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-19 18:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-01-20 8:24 ` [SARCASM] " Ingo Oeser
2006-01-20 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-22 12:51 ` [OT] " Alexander E. Patrakov
2006-01-21 8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 19:41 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-01-21 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-21 21:25 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-21 21:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 17:50 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-21 23:26 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-21 23:53 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-21 23:59 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 0:09 ` Gene Heskett
2006-01-22 0:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-22 1:30 ` Doug McNaught
2006-01-22 8:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 20:33 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-22 21:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060121194102.GB28051@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.